Process Lock-in: Kingdom Operations Strategy
- Umeme Africa

- Apr 11, 2024
- 4 min read

Multiplying, replenishing, and subduing operations are the pillars of manufacturing, ensuring the lights stay on and progress never falters. In the land of production, the Kingdom's operations strategy emerges as the guiding light, illuminating the path forward and fostering dominion outcomes. Being fruitful; implementing the Kingdom Operations Strategy (KOS) is akin to boarding the train that propels manufacturers toward progress.
The foundation of strategic success lies in acknowledging that while no manufacturer can meticulously plan every operational detail, all need a clear direction forward. This understanding prompts the formulation of guiding principles for decision-making, a cornerstone of the Kingdom Operations Strategy (KOS). With its focus on building operations-based capabilities, the KOS aligns with each manufacturer's production position, emphasizing effectiveness, turnaround, and efficiency.
At its core, the KOS operates on the Resource Based View, asserting that sustainable competitive advantage stems from the inherent capabilities of a manufacturer's resources. It's not merely about industry positioning but about leveraging core competencies to gain an edge in the market. By concentrating on critical resources like Human, Processes, and Equipment, the KOS creates scarcity, immobility, and difficulty of imitation or substitution, thereby fostering a sustainable advantage for manufacturers.
The Kingdom Operations Strategy (KOS) transcends mere decision-making; it embodies the comprehensive framework guiding the long-term trajectory of a manufacturer. It encompasses both the content and process of operations strategy, wherein the content refers to specific decisions and actions defining the role, objectives, and activities of operations, while the process denotes the method used to make these decisions.
Manufacturers anticipate their operations strategy to enhance operational performance over time, progressing from minimal contribution to competitive success to market dominance. This journey mirrors the kingdom narrative of first being fruitful, then multiplying, replenishing, and subduing, and ultimately having dominion in operations execution. Thus, the KOS serves as the roadmap guiding manufacturers through each stage of this progression, ensuring sustained growth and market leadership.
Be Fruitful: Implementing operations strategy
"Being fruitful" in implementing operations strategy is foundational to a manufacturer's success. It's the bedrock upon which the entire strategy rests. No matter how ingenious the strategy, without effective implementation, it's futile. Implementation is the process of turning strategic visions into tangible results, ensuring that intended strategies are realized.
However, the manner in which a strategy is fruited varies based on the nature of the changes it entails and the organizational context. Clarity in strategic decisions is paramount, bridging the gap between formulation and implementation stages. Motivational leadership plays a pivotal role, instilling purpose and adaptability throughout the implementation journey.
Operations management is key in breaking down complex plans into manageable tasks, facilitating execution. Professors Hayes and Wheelwright devised a four-stage model to gauge the operations function's contribution:
Stage 1, Internal Neutrality: At this stage, operations hinder rather than enhance competitiveness, focusing inwardly and reacting minimally to external demands.
Stage 2, External Neutrality: Progressing beyond internal focus, the operations function compares itself to peers in the market, aiming to adopt best practices and catch up with industry standards.
"Being fruitful" in operations strategy implementation lays the groundwork for advancement, propelling manufacturers from a passive stance to active engagement with industry norms and competitive benchmarks.
Multiply, Replenish and Subdue: Supporting operations strategy
"Multiplying, replenishing, and subduing" in supporting operations strategy entails more than just implementation—it involves cultivating capabilities that refine and enhance strategic goals.
In Stage 3, operations aim to be among the best in their market, continuously striving for excellence by aligning with the company's strategic objectives. They achieve this by developing operations resources that bolster the organization's competitive edge. This stage is characterized by being "internally supportive," where operations provide a robust strategy to drive the company forward.
Advancing to Stage 4, operations become the cornerstone of the company's competitive success. They adopt a forward-looking approach, anticipating market shifts and proactively developing operations-based capabilities to thrive in evolving conditions. Stage 4 operations are characterized by innovation, creativity, and proactive leadership, positioning the company ahead of competitors as they become "externally supportive."
Strategic control plays a crucial role in this process, involving the continuous evaluation of activities, plans, and performance to ensure alignment with strategic objectives. Corrections are made as necessary to steer future actions towards success. Thus, "multiplying, replenishing, and subduing" in supporting operations strategy is about nurturing capabilities that not only implement but also propel the organization towards sustained excellence and competitiveness.
Have Dominion: Driving operations strategy
"Having dominion" in driving operations strategy represents the most challenging role, where operations not only implements but actively shapes and propels the company's strategic direction. The success of the entire organization hinges on these unique operational capabilities, with operations taking the helm in steering the company's strategy.
Understanding the metrics of Leadership Dominion, Process Dominion, and Equipment Dominion is crucial for ensuring that operations prioritizes its performance objectives effectively. These metrics guide decisions regarding quality, speed, dependability, flexibility, and cost, ensuring alignment with strategic goals.
Structural decisions in operations primarily influence design activities, while infrastructural decisions impact workforce organization, planning, control, and improvement activities.
Effective monitoring serves as an early warning system, diagnosing data and prompting necessary adjustments in the implementation of operations strategy. A plan or map may not be flawless, but it provides purpose and direction, guiding operations in driving the company towards strategic success.







Comments